SENFLOC 2550 Equivalent Screening (CNfloc 1054)
ChinaPAM accepts a confirmed SENFLOC 2550 enquiry, quotes a high-anionic PAM powder screening route, and discusses sample arrangements after the grade and conditions are confirmed. The screening route is led by CNfloc 1054, with CNfloc 1063 as the alternate. Send the model as printed — or a photo of the bag label — and the enquiry opens; ore type, slurry conditions, pH and your current grade and dose can follow.
Supply Route Comparison
Published reference data and the ChinaPAM route for AECI SENFLOC 2550
SENFLOC is a trademark of its owner, and AECI Mining Chemicals is the publisher of the brochure cited on this page. ChinaPAM is an independent manufacturer and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by or a distributor for either. The brand and model names are used only to identify the incumbent product a buyer is asking about. The brochure states that its application matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. Nothing on this page replaces that bench test. Our products are separately branded ChinaPAM grades and are not licensed copies.
| Parameter | ChinaPAM Supply Route | AECI SENFLOC 2550 |
|---|---|---|
| Ionic character | High-anionic polyacrylamide route — CNfloc 1054 screened first, CNfloc 1063 as the alternate | High Anionic, read directly from the exact 2550 row on page 1 |
| Physical form | Anionic polyacrylamide powder | Powder / dry polymer. The brochure states the form at range level on page 2 rather than per grade. |
| Complete suffix | Not applicable — the ChinaPAM grade is identified by its own code | No complete suffix is shown anywhere in the source for this row |
| Application coverage | Screened against the duty you actually run, on your own slurry | Nine printed dots on the 2550 row, including the decanter centrifuge application. A blank cell in the printed matrix is a fact about the brochure’s layout. It is not evidence that the grade cannot be used in that duty, and it is not evidence about what ChinaPAM can supply. |
| Molecular weight | Confirmed from the quoted ChinaPAM grade’s own data at quotation | Not published per grade in the held source |
| Exact charge percentage | Confirmed from the quoted ChinaPAM grade’s own data at quotation | Not published per grade in the held source. The ionic class is the only charge information the row carries. |
| Performance on your slurry | Unknown until a comparative bench test is run; that is the acceptance basis, not a caveat | The brochure states that its application matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. Nothing on this page replaces that bench test. |
| Current availability | Confirmed in the quotation against grade, destination and order conditions | Per-grade molecular weight and exact charge percentage for the branded grade are not published in the held source. Current availability, lead time and current batch documents on either side are not established by this evidence and are confirmed only in a quotation. |
| Documents | Applicable document set and TDS availability are confirmed against the quoted ChinaPAM grade; a batch-specific COA is tied to a confirmed shipment only. Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion now; competitor package size and ChinaPAM stock, lead time, current TDS or COA stay unclaimed until separately confirmed. | A published application brochure with no printed document date. It is an application guide, not a specification. |
Specifications
| Incumbent Model | AECI SENFLOC 2550 (exact brochure row) |
| Screening Basis | Same-chemistry anionic PAM powder route; ionic class established from the exact brochure row; fit confirmed by bench test. |
| Incumbent Ionic Character | High Anionic (exact brochure row, p.1) |
| Incumbent Physical Form | Powder / dry polymer (stated at range level on p.2) |
| Complete Suffix | None shown in the source document |
| Marked Applications In Source | Nine — copper tailings, coal tailings, brine clarification, phosphate slimes, metal hydroxides, kimberlite ores, base metals concentrates, clays and sands, and decanter centrifuge application |
| ChinaPAM Screening Route | CNfloc 1054 screened first; CNfloc 1063 as the alternate |
| Competitor MW / Exact Charge % | Not published in the held source |
| Exact Equivalence | Not supported and not claimed |
| Self-Manufacture Of The Branded Grade | Not established by this evidence |
| Current Availability (Either Side) | Not established by this evidence; confirmed in a quotation |
| Acceptance Basis | Laboratory bench test on the actual slurry, as the brochure itself requires |
| Document Date / Issuer | Not printed in the source; AECI Mining Chemicals brochure row for SENFLOC 2550 |
Key Features
- An exact-row answer: 2550 is named in the source brochure, not inferred from a family description
- All nine printed application dots published as they appear, including the decanter centrifuge dot that separates 2550 from its closest siblings
- High-anionic direction used as the screening start — CNfloc 1054 first, CNfloc 1063 as the alternate
- The brochure’s own rule respected: its matrix is a guide and the bench test decides
- Wetting and shear discipline taken from the brochure’s handling page rather than from general advice
- Two documented failure modes, each with the check that catches it
- What the source does not publish — molecular weight, exact charge percentage, current availability — listed as unknown instead of filled in
Applications
- Copper tailings thickening and tailings-dam duty where the incumbent is named as SENFLOC 2550
- Coal tailings and coal-prep thickener screening on a high-anionic route
- Decanter centrifuge feed conditioning, which the source marks on this row specifically
- Brine clarification, phosphate slimes and metal-hydroxide duties marked on the same row
- Kimberlite ores, base metals concentrates and clays-and-sands applications marked on the same row
Get a Quote for AECI SENFLOC 2550 Alternative Supply
The model name or a bag-label photo is enough to start. Ore or slurry type, pH, your current grade and your current dose make the first screening recommendation much sharper.
Related Articles
The supply answer first: CNfloc 1054, with 1063 as the alternate
A confirmed SENFLOC 2550 enquiry gets a high-anionic PAM powder screening route from ChinaPAM. CNfloc 1054 is screened first and CNfloc 1063 is the alternate. Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion from the first message — those are commercial decisions, not things waiting on evidence.
The state is same-type screening. ChinaPAM does not claim to supply the branded SENFLOC grade, does not claim exact equivalence and does not claim to manufacture the competitor product. What the held source does establish is the ionic class of the exact row, and that is enough to start from the correct chemistry.
The brochure cited here is published by AECI Mining Chemicals and proves nothing about any ChinaPAM factory or any ChinaPAM result. Trust assets on this page are ChinaPAM’s own: you can review the manufacturing position on the supplier profile and the document position on the certifications and compliance page.
Identity: the exact row, and what the source does not print
SENFLOC 2550 appears as an exact row in the brochure rather than being inferred from a family description. Confirm the identity with the model name exactly as printed or a photograph of the bag label.
No complete suffix appears anywhere in the source for this row. If your label carries a suffix, send it — it may change the screening route, and ChinaPAM will not fill it in by assumption.
Per-grade molecular weight and exact charge percentage for the branded grade are not published in the held source. Current availability, lead time and current batch documents on either side are not established by this evidence and are confirmed only in a quotation.
Three facts the held source actually establishes
All three come from page 1 of the brochure, and all three are about the printed row rather than about performance.
| Fact | Where it comes from | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| SENFLOC 2550 is an exact listed model, classified as High Anionic. | AECI brochure, page 1, exact 2550 row. | The ionic class only. No molecular weight, no charge percentage and no performance figure. |
| The 2550 row carries printed dots for both copper tailings and coal tailings. | AECI brochure, page 1, application matrix. | That the brochure positions the grade for those duties as a guide. It is not a result on your ore, and it sets no dose. |
| The same row also carries dots for brine clarification, phosphate slimes, metal hydroxides, kimberlite ores, base metals concentrates, clays and sands, and decanter centrifuge application — nine marked applications in total. | AECI brochure, page 1, application matrix. | Breadth of the brochure’s positioning. The decanter dot in particular is a source fact about 2550 and is not transferable to a sibling grade that does not carry it. |
Process conditions and the targets that define a pass
Useful intake: the ore or slurry type and where in the circuit the polymer is dosed; solids percentage; pH; temperature; water chemistry including salinity where it matters; your current grade and current dose; and the settling, clarity or dewatering target you are judged against.
Each duty marked on this row is screened on its own slurry. Copper tailings, coal tailings and a decanter feed are different hydrodynamic and chemical environments, and a result in one is not carried into another just because the brochure marks both on the same line.
Acceptance targets are agreed before the bench test: settling rate, supernatant clarity, underflow density or cake dryness as the duty requires, plus throughput, active dose and handling behaviour.
Preparation, dosing and the two failure modes
The brochure requires an approved dispenser and effective wetting to prevent lumps, and it warns against excessive turbulence once flocs have formed and against centrifugal pumps on flocculated streams.
Both failure modes below are taken from the brochure’s own handling and selection guidance for this product family, not from general advice. Both are cheap to check.
| Trigger | Consequence | Verification step |
|---|---|---|
| Dry polymer is poorly wetted on make-up — most often on copper or coal tailings duty, or when a decanter make-up line is set up in a hurry. | Lumps and partially hydrated polymer, which waste dose and can block make-up and dosing lines. | Use an approved dispenser and confirm effective wetting; inspect for lumps and undissolved material and confirm pump delivery before any treatment result is recorded. |
| Excessive turbulence after flocs have formed, or a centrifugal pump on the flocculated stream — typically on decanter feed or post-floc transfer. | Mechanical shear breaks the flocs, so settling and dewatering look poor at a dose that was actually correct. | Review the dosing point and transfer arrangement for shear, avoid centrifugal pumps on flocculated streams, and re-measure settling rate and clarity after the shear path is corrected. |
Validation: the bench test the brochure itself demands
The brochure states that its application matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. Nothing on this page replaces that bench test.
Run the comparison on the same slurry, the same equipment and the same time window, normalised to active polymer rather than to solution volume, across a dose ladder instead of a single point. Record settling rate, supernatant clarity, floc strength under the shear the circuit actually applies, underflow or cake result and the full dose response.
Screen CNfloc 1054 first and bring CNfloc 1063 in as the alternate. Keep the duties separate: if more than one of the marked applications is in scope, each gets its own line in the test programme.
Commercial boundary and how to start
Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion now — use Get Price, Request a Sample, WhatsApp or Email. The model name or a bag-label photo is enough to open the enquiry, and the process detail can follow.
Applicable document set and TDS availability are confirmed against the quoted ChinaPAM grade; a batch-specific COA is tied to a confirmed shipment only. Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion now; competitor package size and ChinaPAM stock, lead time, current TDS or COA stay unclaimed until separately confirmed.
Brand Equivalents & Replacements
ChinaPAM accepts a SENFLOC 2550 enquiry and screens its own high-anionic PAM powder route against the exact brochure row. Screening works from the held document and the application conditions you state, then a quotation follows, and sample arrangements are discussed from there. The brochure publishes no per-grade molecular weight or numeric charge, so final selection belongs to a bench test on your own slurry — this page makes no tested-replacement, identical-product or guaranteed-performance claim.
| Brand | Grade | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AECI SENFLOC | 2550 | Exact brochure row classified High Anionic with nine marked applications, including both copper tailings and coal tailings plus a decanter centrifuge dot. ChinaPAM screens CNfloc 1054 first with CNfloc 1063 as the alternate. Same-type screening only; the brochure requires a bench test for final selection. |
Need a replacement for a different grade? Contact us with your current product specs.
Frequently Asked Questions — SENFLOC 2550 Equivalent Screening (CNfloc 1054)
Can ChinaPAM supply for a SENFLOC 2550 requirement?
Yes — as a same-type high-anionic PAM powder screening route led by CNfloc 1054, with CNfloc 1063 as the alternate. Price and samples are open for discussion from the first message. What is not claimed is exact equivalence, manufacture of the branded grade, or any guaranteed performance before a bench test on your slurry.
What does the source actually prove about 2550?
Three things, all from page 1 of the AECI brochure: that 2550 is an exact listed model classified High Anionic; that its row carries printed dots for both copper tailings and coal tailings; and that the same row carries seven further dots, nine in total, including a decanter centrifuge application. It proves nothing about molecular weight, charge percentage, current availability or performance on your ore.
Why does the decanter dot matter?
Because it separates 2550 from its closest siblings in the same brochure. Grades that look otherwise identical in the matrix do not all carry that dot, so a decanter enquiry answered from a sibling row would rely on a different source fact. ChinaPAM keeps the decanter route with 2550 because its source row actually carries the printed dot.
Can you match the molecular weight or the charge percentage?
Not from this evidence — neither figure is published per grade in the source. The ionic class is the only charge information the row carries, and that is what the screening route starts from. The remaining band question is settled by a comparative bench test, not by a number comparison.
Do we have to run a bench test, or can we work from the matrix?
The brochure answers that itself: it states its matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. ChinaPAM follows the same rule. The test is where the dose ladder, floc strength under real shear and the actual acceptance result come from.
What is still unresolved on this page?
Per-grade molecular weight and exact charge percentage for the branded grade; a ChinaPAM comparative test result on your specific slurry; and current inventory, lead time and batch documents on either side. Those last three are quotation and shipment matters and are confirmed there rather than asserted here.
Related Products
Trademark notice. AECI SENFLOC 2550 and all other third-party product and brand names on this page are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Henan Jinghua New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or authorised by those owners, and no such relationship is implied. Those names are used here for the sole purpose of identifying the products our grades are compared against, which is necessary to describe what we supply. Our products are separately branded ChinaPAM grades and are not licensed copies. Grade descriptors quoted for third-party products are taken from each manufacturer’s own published literature and follow that manufacturer’s own scale; we do not publish figures those manufacturers do not publish. Performance on your process should be confirmed by jar test or CST test before any change of supply.