SENFLOC 3180 Equivalent Screening (CNfloc 1054)
ChinaPAM accepts a confirmed SENFLOC 3180 enquiry, quotes a high-anionic PAM powder screening route, and discusses sample arrangements after the grade and conditions are confirmed. The screening route is led by CNfloc 1054, with CNfloc 1063 as the alternate. Send the model as printed — or a bag-label photo — and the enquiry opens; slurry or brine conditions, pH and your current grade and dose can follow.
Supply Route Comparison
Published reference data and the ChinaPAM route for AECI SENFLOC 3180
SENFLOC is a trademark of its owner, and AECI Mining Chemicals is the publisher of the brochure cited on this page. ChinaPAM is an independent manufacturer and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by or a distributor for either. The brand and model names are used only to identify the incumbent product a buyer is asking about. The brochure states that its application matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. Nothing on this page replaces that bench test. Our products are separately branded ChinaPAM grades and are not licensed copies.
| Parameter | ChinaPAM Supply Route | AECI SENFLOC 3180 |
|---|---|---|
| Ionic character | High-anionic polyacrylamide route — CNfloc 1054 screened first, CNfloc 1063 as the alternate | High Anionic, read directly from the exact 3180 row on page 1 |
| Physical form | Anionic polyacrylamide powder | Powder / dry polymer, stated at range level on page 2 rather than per grade |
| Complete suffix | Not applicable — the ChinaPAM grade is identified by its own code | No complete suffix is shown anywhere in the source for this row |
| Application coverage | Screened against the duty you actually run, on your own slurry or liquor | Eight printed dots on the 3180 row, including iron ore tailings. A blank cell in the printed matrix is a fact about the brochure’s layout. It is not evidence that the grade cannot be used in that duty, and it is not evidence about what ChinaPAM can supply. |
| Decanter centrifuge position | Screened on request against the actual machine and feed, like any other duty | The source prints no decanter dot on the 3180 row. That is a layout fact about the brochure, not a non-use claim, and no decanter route is inferred from a sibling row. |
| Molecular weight | Confirmed from the quoted ChinaPAM grade’s own data at quotation | Not published per grade in the held source |
| Exact charge percentage | Confirmed from the quoted ChinaPAM grade’s own data at quotation | Not published per grade in the held source; the ionic class is the only charge information the row carries |
| Performance on your feed | Unknown until a comparative bench test is run; that is the acceptance basis | The brochure states that its application matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. Nothing on this page replaces that bench test. |
| Current availability | Confirmed in the quotation against grade, destination and order conditions | Per-grade molecular weight and exact charge percentage for the branded grade are not published in the held source. Current availability, lead time and current batch documents on either side are not established by this evidence and are confirmed only in a quotation. |
| Documents | Applicable document set and TDS availability are confirmed against the quoted ChinaPAM grade; a batch-specific COA is tied to a confirmed shipment only. Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion now; competitor package size and ChinaPAM stock, lead time, current TDS or COA stay unclaimed until separately confirmed. | A published application brochure with no printed document date. It is an application guide, not a specification. |
Specifications
| Incumbent Model | AECI SENFLOC 3180 (exact brochure row) |
| Screening Basis | Same-chemistry anionic PAM powder route; ionic class established from the exact brochure row; fit confirmed by bench test. |
| Incumbent Ionic Character | High Anionic (exact brochure row, p.1) |
| Incumbent Physical Form | Powder / dry polymer (stated at range level on p.2) |
| Complete Suffix | None shown in the source document |
| Marked Applications In Source | Eight — coal tailings, brine clarification, phosphate slimes, metal hydroxides, kimberlite ores, base metals concentrates, iron ore tailings, and clays and sands |
| Decanter Centrifuge Dot | Not printed on the 3180 row. That is a source-layout fact and not a statement that the grade cannot be used there. |
| ChinaPAM Screening Route | CNfloc 1054 screened first; CNfloc 1063 as the alternate |
| Competitor MW / Exact Charge % | Not published in the held source |
| Exact Equivalence | Not supported and not claimed |
| Self-Manufacture Of The Branded Grade | Not established by this evidence |
| Current Availability (Either Side) | Not established by this evidence; confirmed in a quotation |
| Acceptance Basis | Laboratory bench test on the actual slurry or liquor, as the brochure itself requires |
| Document Date / Issuer | Not printed in the source; AECI Mining Chemicals brochure row for SENFLOC 3180 |
Key Features
- An exact-row answer: 3180 is named in the source brochure rather than inferred from a family
- Iron ore tailings published as a marked dot on this row — a duty the closest siblings do not all carry
- Blank matrix cells stated explicitly as a layout fact, not quietly used as a negative
- High-anionic direction used as the screening start — CNfloc 1054 first, CNfloc 1063 as the alternate
- Brine clarification handled on its own water chemistry rather than from a tailings result
- Two documented failure modes, each with the check that catches it
- Unknowns kept visible: molecular weight, exact charge percentage and current availability are not published and are not filled in
Applications
- Coal tailings and coal-prep thickener screening where the incumbent is named as SENFLOC 3180
- Brine clarification duty on a high-anionic route, screened on the actual liquor
- Iron ore tailings thickening, which the source marks on this row
- Phosphate slimes, metal hydroxides and kimberlite ores marked on the same row
- Base metals concentrates and clays-and-sands applications marked on the same row
Get a Quote for AECI SENFLOC 3180 Alternative Supply
The model name or a bag-label photo starts it. For a brine or coal-tailings duty, water chemistry and your current dose are the two details that most change the first recommendation.
Related Articles
The supply answer first: CNfloc 1054, with 1063 as the alternate
A confirmed SENFLOC 3180 enquiry gets a high-anionic PAM powder screening route from ChinaPAM. CNfloc 1054 is screened first and CNfloc 1063 is the alternate. Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion from the first message.
The state is same-type screening. ChinaPAM does not claim to supply the branded SENFLOC grade, does not claim exact equivalence and does not claim to manufacture the competitor product. The ionic class of the exact row is what the held source establishes, and it is enough to start from the right chemistry.
The AECI brochure cited here proves nothing about any ChinaPAM factory or any ChinaPAM result. The trust assets on this page are ChinaPAM’s own: the manufacturing position is on the supplier profile and the document position on the certifications and compliance page.
Identity: the exact row, and the blank cells that mean nothing
SENFLOC 3180 appears as an exact row in the brochure rather than being inferred from a family description. Confirm the identity with the model name exactly as printed or a photograph of the bag label.
The 3180 row carries eight dots but no decanter centrifuge dot. A blank cell in the printed matrix is a fact about the brochure’s layout. It is not evidence that the grade cannot be used in that duty, and it is not evidence about what ChinaPAM can supply. ChinaPAM screens any decanter enquiry against the actual machine and feed and does not copy a sibling row’s decanter route onto 3180.
Per-grade molecular weight and exact charge percentage for the branded grade are not published in the held source. Current availability, lead time and current batch documents on either side are not established by this evidence and are confirmed only in a quotation.
Three facts the held source actually establishes
All three come from page 1 of the brochure and all three concern the printed row rather than performance.
| Fact | Where it comes from | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| SENFLOC 3180 is an exact listed model, classified as High Anionic. | AECI brochure, page 1, exact 3180 row. | The ionic class only. No molecular weight, no charge percentage and no performance figure. |
| The 3180 row carries printed dots for both coal tailings and brine clarification. | AECI brochure, page 1, application matrix. | Brochure positioning as a guide. Two duties on one row does not mean a result in one transfers to the other — brine chemistry and tailings chemistry are different problems. |
| The same row also carries dots for phosphate slimes, metal hydroxides, kimberlite ores, base metals concentrates, iron ore tailings, and clays and sands — eight marked applications in total. | AECI brochure, page 1, application matrix. | Breadth of positioning only. The cells left blank on this row carry no negative meaning. |
Process conditions and the targets that define a pass
Useful intake: the slurry or liquor type and the dosing point in the circuit; solids percentage; pH; temperature; water chemistry, which matters more than usual on a brine duty; your current grade and dose; and the settling, clarity or dewatering target you are measured against.
Brine clarification and coal tailings are screened separately even though the brochure marks both on this row. Dissolved salts change polymer conformation and dose response, so a tailings result is not evidence for a brine duty or the reverse.
Acceptance targets are agreed before the bench test: settling rate, supernatant clarity, underflow density or cake dryness as the duty requires, plus throughput, active dose and handling behaviour.
Preparation, dosing and the two failure modes
The brochure requires an approved dispenser and effective wetting to prevent lumps, and it warns against excessive turbulence once flocs have formed and against centrifugal pumps on flocculated streams.
Both failure modes below come from the brochure’s own handling and selection guidance and both are cheap to verify before any bulk commitment.
| Trigger | Consequence | Verification step |
|---|---|---|
| Dry polymer is poorly wetted on make-up — commonly on a coal tailings line, and especially where make-up water is saline. | Lumps and partially hydrated polymer, wasting dose and risking blocked make-up and dosing lines. | Use an approved dispenser and confirm effective wetting; inspect for lumps and undissolved material and confirm pump delivery before recording any treatment result. |
| Excessive turbulence after flocs have formed, or a centrifugal pump on the flocculated stream. | Shear breaks the flocs, so settling and clarity read as failures at a dose that was in fact correct. | Review the dosing point and transfer path for shear, avoid centrifugal pumps on flocculated streams, and re-measure settling rate and supernatant clarity once the shear path is corrected. |
Validation: the bench test the brochure itself demands
The brochure states that its application matrix is a guide and that final selection must be based on laboratory bench-test results. Nothing on this page replaces that bench test.
Run the comparison on the same feed, the same equipment and the same time window, normalised to active polymer rather than solution volume, across a dose ladder instead of a single point. Record settling rate, supernatant clarity, floc strength under the shear the circuit actually applies, underflow or cake result and the full dose response.
CNfloc 1054 is screened first and CNfloc 1063 is the alternate. Where brine and tailings duties are both in scope, each gets its own line in the test programme rather than one standing in for the other.
Commercial boundary and how to start
Price and sample arrangements are open now — Get Price, Request a Sample, WhatsApp or Email. The model name or a bag-label photo opens the enquiry and process detail can follow.
Applicable document set and TDS availability are confirmed against the quoted ChinaPAM grade; a batch-specific COA is tied to a confirmed shipment only. Price and sample arrangements are open for discussion now; competitor package size and ChinaPAM stock, lead time, current TDS or COA stay unclaimed until separately confirmed.
Brand Equivalents & Replacements
A SENFLOC 3180 enquiry is answered with ChinaPAM’s own high-anionic PAM powder screening route, read against the exact brochure row rather than against a sibling grade. ChinaPAM takes the enquiry, screens on the held document and your stated duty, quotes, and discusses sample arrangements from there. Comparative performance against the branded grade is untested until a bench test on your feed is run, so nothing here is offered as a tested replacement or an equivalent-performance guarantee.
| Brand | Grade | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AECI SENFLOC | 3180 | Exact brochure row classified High Anionic with eight marked applications, including both coal tailings and brine clarification plus an iron ore tailings dot. ChinaPAM screens CNfloc 1054 first with CNfloc 1063 as the alternate. Same-type screening only; the brochure requires a bench test for final selection. |
Need a replacement for a different grade? Contact us with your current product specs.
Frequently Asked Questions — SENFLOC 3180 Equivalent Screening (CNfloc 1054)
Can ChinaPAM supply for a SENFLOC 3180 requirement?
Yes — as a same-type high-anionic PAM powder screening route led by CNfloc 1054, with CNfloc 1063 as the alternate. Price and samples are open for discussion immediately. Exact equivalence, manufacture of the branded grade and guaranteed performance before a bench test are not claimed.
What does the source actually prove about 3180?
Three things from page 1 of the AECI brochure: that 3180 is an exact listed model classified High Anionic; that its row carries printed dots for both coal tailings and brine clarification; and that the same row carries six further dots, eight in total, including iron ore tailings. Molecular weight, charge percentage, availability and performance on your feed are all outside what it proves.
The 3180 row has no decanter centrifuge dot. Does that rule it out for a decanter?
No. The absence of a printed dot is a fact about the brochure’s layout, not a statement that the grade cannot be used in that duty and not a statement about what ChinaPAM can supply. ChinaPAM screens a decanter enquiry against the actual machine and feed and does not copy a sibling row’s decanter route onto 3180.
Can a coal tailings result be used for the brine clarification duty?
Not safely. The brochure marks both on this row, but dissolved salts change how an anionic polymer extends in solution and therefore change the dose response. Each duty gets its own bench test line, and a pass on one is not evidence for the other.
Can you match the molecular weight or the charge percentage?
Not from this evidence — neither figure is published per grade in the source. The ionic class is the only charge information the row carries, and the remaining band question is settled by a comparative bench test rather than by comparing numbers.
What is still unresolved on this page?
Per-grade molecular weight and exact charge percentage for the branded grade; a ChinaPAM comparative test result on your feed; and current inventory, lead time and batch documents on either side, which are quotation and shipment matters.
Related Products
Trademark notice. AECI SENFLOC 3180 and all other third-party product and brand names on this page are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Henan Jinghua New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or authorised by those owners, and no such relationship is implied. Those names are used here for the sole purpose of identifying the products our grades are compared against, which is necessary to describe what we supply. Our products are separately branded ChinaPAM grades and are not licensed copies. Grade descriptors quoted for third-party products are taken from each manufacturer’s own published literature and follow that manufacturer’s own scale; we do not publish figures those manufacturers do not publish. Performance on your process should be confirmed by jar test or CST test before any change of supply.